Life After Life — Kate Atkinson

Cover of Life After Life by Kate Atkinson“What if you had the chance to live your life again and again, until you finally got it right?” This plot micro-summary was enough to make me pick up this book. That and Kate Atkinson’s reputation. I had planned to read her first novel when it was released; then her second and third, but somehow I never managed to read any of them. I probably will now.

So I wondered, suppose you did get the chance to live your life again and again. How would you know that you were getting repeat chances? And how would you know when you finally got it right? And then what would happen? Atkinson manages to convincingly address these questions, but without letting the technical issues dominate an affecting story of an engaging and (necessarily) resilient protagonist living through two world wars. The story is about her inner life, her family life, and society during these unimaginably difficult times.

I don’t normally go for the sorts of book that attempt to situate a human drama within the wider sweep of history. (I did enjoy War and Peace, but that was mainly because everyone was so exotic and cosmopolitan.) In the author note for Life After Life on her website, Atkinson says that “there are few things more uncomfortable for the reader than to be constantly stumbling over the pathologically recondite research of an author.” She’s right — this is one thing that really turns me off a lot of fiction. (I think some people like it though. I suppose somebody has to read those books.)

Writing in the London Review of Books, Adam Mars-Jones was unimpressed by Life After Life. He seems to want Atkinson to take us into the technical details of the way the lives fit together in alternative timelines, as if he were reviewing The Matrix or Inception of some other such science-fiction confection (confiction?). He claims that Atkinson fails to see the enormity of her heroine’s situation, whereas I thought that this was exactly the point she tries to convey. In short, I think Mr Mars-Jones has missed the point of Life After Life. Still, as usual for the LRB, his review is well worth reading (but be warned that it is full of spoilers).

So I say: read this book. But to get full effect from the ending, which I found powerful and thought-provoking yet subtle, take my advice: Don’t read the table of contents.

Did you like this? Sharing is good!
This review is about , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Life After Life — Kate Atkinson

  1. Jonathan Chen says:

    This sounds a bit like Ken Grimwood’s “Replay” – which is still readablle even after 25 years.

  2. Bennett says:

    Hmm, Replay looks good. Life After Life can be frustrating because the main character generally doesn’t remember any of her previous lives. (In fact she gets both flashbacks and flashforwards, so are they really “previous” lives? One of the book’s many interesting ambiguities.) The situation in Replay sounds more straightforward; I guess the characters are more easily able to use their past-life memories to actually make things happen.

    I have added Replay to my already unfeasibly long to-read list. Hopefully I will get around to reading it in this life.

  3. Bennett McElwee says:

    And I finally did get around to buying and reviewing Replay

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *